{"id":28348,"date":"2017-01-03T01:29:39","date_gmt":"2017-01-02T22:29:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.afidep.org\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/"},"modified":"2017-01-03T01:29:39","modified_gmt":"2017-01-02T22:29:39","slug":"systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking","status":"publish","type":"multimedia","link":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/","title":{"rendered":"Systematic Reviews: Why are they the most preferred in evidence uptake for policy-making?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Systematic Reviews: Why are they most preferred in evidence uptake for policymaking?\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/efu3Sjou5gs?start=440&#038;feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Carrying out a systematic review is a highly technical undertaking and also tends to be time-consuming. However, the rigour required to produce a good review ensures that the evidence it contains is of better value than that presented through other common tools such as policy briefs and single studies.<\/p>\n<p>We speak with Dr. Laurenz Langer, an Evidence Uptake Specialist at the Africa Centre for Evidence-based at the University of Johannesburg to further understand why systematic reviews are so highly regarded when it comes to evidence uptake for policymaking.<\/p>\n<p>We also speak with Dr Ferdinand Okwaro, Senior Knowledge Scientist, and Ms Violet Murunga, Senior Knowledge Translation Officer, both from AFIDEP, to offer their views of this tool based on a training they attended in November 2016 offered by the Africa Centre for Systematic Reviews and Knowledge Translation, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University and the Africa Centre for Evidence, University of Johannesburg.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":26343,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"give_campaign_id":0,"inline_featured_image":false},"tags":[],"programme":[3000],"multimedia_type":[3113],"country":[796,819,797,798,799,800,820,829,821,830,831,813,801,802,803,822,823,804,824,805,825,923,806,807,826,808,809,810,832,827,833,811,834,812,814,815,828,917,816,817,818],"cop26":[],"class_list":["post-28348","multimedia","type-multimedia","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","programme-gouvernance-et-responsabilite","multimedia_type-videos-fr","country-angola","country-benin","country-botswana","country-burkina-faso","country-burundi","country-cameroon","country-cape-verde","country-comoros","country-cote-divoire","country-djibouti","country-eritrea","country-eswatini","country-ethiopia","country-gabon","country-ghana","country-guinea","country-guinea-bissau","country-kenya","country-liberia","country-malawi","country-mali","country-mauritius","country-mozambique","country-namibia","country-niger","country-nigeria","country-rwanda","country-senegal","country-seychelles","country-sierra-leone","country-somalia","country-south-africa","country-south-sudan","country-sudan","country-tanzania","country-the-gambia","country-togo","country-tunisia","country-uganda","country-zambia","country-zimbabwe"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Systematic Reviews: Why are they the most preferred in evidence uptake for policy-making? - African Institute for Development Policy - AFIDEP<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Carrying out a systematic review is a highly technical undertaking and also tends to be time consuming. However, the rigour required to produce a good review ensures that the evidence it contains is of better value than that presented through other common tools such as policy briefs and single studies.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Systematic Reviews: Why are they the most preferred in evidence uptake for policy-making? - African Institute for Development Policy - AFIDEP\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Carrying out a systematic review is a highly technical undertaking and also tends to be time consuming. However, the rigour required to produce a good review ensures that the evidence it contains is of better value than that presented through other common tools such as policy briefs and single studies.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"African Institute for Development Policy - AFIDEP\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/maxresdefault-5.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"720\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/\",\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews: Why are they the most preferred in evidence uptake for policy-making? - African Institute for Development Policy - AFIDEP\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/maxresdefault-5.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-01-02T22:29:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-02T22:29:39+00:00\",\"description\":\"Carrying out a systematic review is a highly technical undertaking and also tends to be time consuming. However, the rigour required to produce a good review ensures that the evidence it contains is of better value than that presented through other common tools such as policy briefs and single studies.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/maxresdefault-5.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/maxresdefault-5.jpg\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":720},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews: Why are they the most preferred in evidence uptake for policy-making?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/\",\"name\":\"African Institute for Development Policy - AFIDEP\",\"description\":\"Bridging Development Research, Policy &amp; Practice\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Systematic Reviews: Why are they the most preferred in evidence uptake for policy-making? - African Institute for Development Policy - AFIDEP","description":"Carrying out a systematic review is a highly technical undertaking and also tends to be time consuming. However, the rigour required to produce a good review ensures that the evidence it contains is of better value than that presented through other common tools such as policy briefs and single studies.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Systematic Reviews: Why are they the most preferred in evidence uptake for policy-making? - African Institute for Development Policy - AFIDEP","og_description":"Carrying out a systematic review is a highly technical undertaking and also tends to be time consuming. However, the rigour required to produce a good review ensures that the evidence it contains is of better value than that presented through other common tools such as policy briefs and single studies.","og_url":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/","og_site_name":"African Institute for Development Policy - AFIDEP","og_image":[{"width":1280,"height":720,"url":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/maxresdefault-5.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Dur\u00e9e de lecture estim\u00e9e":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/","url":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/","name":"Systematic Reviews: Why are they the most preferred in evidence uptake for policy-making? - African Institute for Development Policy - AFIDEP","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/maxresdefault-5.jpg","datePublished":"2017-01-02T22:29:39+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-02T22:29:39+00:00","description":"Carrying out a systematic review is a highly technical undertaking and also tends to be time consuming. However, the rigour required to produce a good review ensures that the evidence it contains is of better value than that presented through other common tools such as policy briefs and single studies.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/maxresdefault-5.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/02\/maxresdefault-5.jpg","width":1280,"height":720},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/multimedia\/systematic-reviews-why-are-they-the-most-preferred-in-evidence-uptake-for-policymaking\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Systematic Reviews: Why are they the most preferred in evidence uptake for policy-making?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/","name":"African Institute for Development Policy - AFIDEP","description":"Bridging Development Research, Policy &amp; Practice","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/multimedia\/28348","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/multimedia"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/multimedia"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/26343"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28348"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28348"},{"taxonomy":"programme","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/programme?post=28348"},{"taxonomy":"multimedia_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/multimedia_type?post=28348"},{"taxonomy":"country","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/country?post=28348"},{"taxonomy":"cop26","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afidep.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/cop26?post=28348"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}